How many 5 year olds could you beat up???
ffactoryxx
26-11-2005 11:15:06
You're in the middle of an arena. You're being attacked by 5 year olds who will stop at nothing to kill you. How many can you take on before they overcome you? There are an unlimited number of 5 year olds.
With no weapon?
With weapon of choice?
drummer_kew_03
26-11-2005 11:22:23
I saw a site where a guy had an amazing response to that question, but I can't find it anymore.
Cgb8000
26-11-2005 11:32:29
well i dunno, with just my fists probobly 20-30? eventually i would just get really really tired and die.. my weapon of choice would be maybe a flame thrower.. or that may not work because flaming 5 year old would be even worse then normal ones.. hmm yeah.. maybe a double edged sword.. a quadspade maybe and i would just swing around in circles slashing em all.. yeah...
stiles05s
26-11-2005 12:35:52
probably 25 without weapon.
unlimited with WOC = ninja sword. lol
Automag389
26-11-2005 12:40:24
Not sure how many without a weapon... but quite a few with that katana that can cut a bullet in half.
Wolfeman
26-11-2005 13:27:39
100 with nothing, 250 with a baton...

http//www.armynavyshop.com/closeups/rc10078.jpg[" alt=""/img20169bad2c]
tracemhunter
26-11-2005 13:30:19
i would say about 60 without a weapon (breaking their necks). but my weapons of choice would be a chainsaw and molitov's.
justinag06
26-11-2005 13:37:20
[quote4fd14f2f08="tracemhunter"]i would say about 60 without a weapon (breaking their necks). but my weapons of choice would be a chainsaw and molitov's.[/quote4fd14f2f08]
those would have massive psychological implications against said enemy also
Automag389
26-11-2005 13:46:34
[quote62c812e3ab="tracemhunter"]i would say about 60 without a weapon (breaking their necks). but my weapons of choice would be a [b62c812e3ab]chainsaw and molitov's[/b62c812e3ab].[/quote62c812e3ab]
GTA much? P The molitovs would probably just create a bunch of rampaging, flaming 5-year-olds who would still run at you and most likely light you on fire... if you don't cut them down with the chainsaw first.
theysayjump
26-11-2005 13:50:41
4.
tracemhunter
26-11-2005 13:51:41
[quotebb81578752="Automag389"][quotebb81578752="tracemhunter"]i would say about 60 without a weapon (breaking their necks). but my weapons of choice would be a [bbb81578752]chainsaw and molitov's[/bbb81578752].[/quotebb81578752]
GTA much? P The molitovs would probably just create a bunch of rampaging, flaming 5-year-olds who would still run at you and most likely light you on fire... if you don't cut them down with the chainsaw first.[/quotebb81578752]
lol yea i am a gta god. my cousin and i beat gta 3 in 5 days when it came out. not just the missions but hidden packages, rampages, taxi, ambulance, firetruck, dropping cars off at the garages and all that stuff. we got to 100% complete.
stiles05s
26-11-2005 16:53:39
gta3 > li
nate08
26-11-2005 19:43:17
Seriously every weapon of choice puts a visual picture in my mind of young children dying...
ughh
But I could probably take down 150 before I started to crumble...
phorty
26-11-2005 20:22:02
WOC ...michael jackson w/viagra
johnjimjones
26-11-2005 20:45:17
[quote7ef12149b4="phorty"]WOC ...michael jackson w/viagra[/quote7ef12149b4]
haha, damn good choice
I think I could take about 75.
Weapon of choice....hmmm....I'll take that machine gun that Jesse Ventura has in Predator.
Sweeney2066
26-11-2005 22:03:31
Depends how many come at me at one time. I'd kill a big fat one and use him as a weapon. Wait is that allowed?
mnx12
26-11-2005 22:32:18
0, I run
Probaly around 150. twisted
FreeOffersNow
26-11-2005 22:53:20
[quote1b644c8085="loquacious (MeFi)"]Whoever made this game up - and whomever here thinks that they can handle any number of 5 year olds greater than zero - has never seen the sheer, unbridled, unhuman carnage generated by a sugar-saturated 5 year old in the middle of an outright tantrum orgy.
And it's a well known fact that children under the age of 16 or so aren't made of flesh and bone, but indestructible rubber. When content they bounce off of concrete like four-square balls.
Plus, the volume of space 5 year olds occupy and the average index of violence associated with them increases exponentially with each additional 5 year old.
With judicious and conservative calculations, 30 sugar-saturated 5 year olds can occupy a volume equal to that of a major sports stadium, and has an energy potential equal to or greater than a 25 megaton thermonuclear device.
You have no chance; Make your time.
5 year olds taken down = zero.[/quote1b644c8085]
Allen626
26-11-2005 23:06:50
[quote4ffab845b2="FreeOffersNow"][quote4ffab845b2="loquacious (MeFi)"]Whoever made this game up - and whomever here thinks that they can handle any number of 5 year olds greater than zero - has never seen the sheer, unbridled, unhuman carnage generated by a sugar-saturated 5 year old in the middle of an outright tantrum orgy.
And it's a well known fact that children under the age of 16 or so aren't made of flesh and bone, but indestructible rubber. When content they bounce off of concrete like four-square balls.
Plus, the volume of space 5 year olds occupy and the average index of violence associated with them increases exponentially with each additional 5 year old.
With judicious and conservative calculations, 30 sugar-saturated 5 year olds can occupy a volume equal to that of a major sports stadium, and has an energy potential equal to or greater than a 25 megaton thermonuclear device.
You have no chance; Make your time.
5 year olds taken down = zero.[/quote4ffab845b2][/quote4ffab845b2]
That is so true.
ffactoryxx
27-11-2005 01:13:49
Well I think I could take down ininifte 5 year olds. My method would be to kill them and make a giant wall of 5 year olds with one entrance and knock them out 1 by 1 as they entered.
Infinite you say?
Well if we are talking about non-ficticous numbers and depending on the current wind velocity.
15000000000 would like a seem more realistic number
[quotea8cfcd925b="ffactoryxx"]Well I think I could take down ininifte 5 year olds. My method would be to kill them and make a giant wall of 5 year olds with one entrance and knock them out 1 by 1 as they entered.
Infinite you say?
Well if we are talking about non-ficticous numbers and depending on the current wind velocity.
15000000000 would like a seem more realistic number[/quotea8cfcd925b]
HAHAAH, Nice horse
ilanbg
27-11-2005 12:19:29
[quote30479a9f90="ffactoryxx"]Well I think I could take down ininifte 5 year olds. My method would be to kill them and make a giant wall of 5 year olds with one entrance and knock them out 1 by 1 as they entered.
Infinite you say?
Well if we are talking about non-ficticous numbers and depending on the current wind velocity.
15000000000 would like a seem more realistic number[/quote30479a9f90]
Impossible. I doubt you could do any sort of physical activity for 15 million seconds (over 17 hours). And that's assuming you can kill one child per second.
It would depend how quickly the children entered the room. If it were only one or two at a time, it would all depend on how much energy I had. If there were hundreds, I could probably only kill about 6 before they clung to every limb and crushed/suffocated me.
With my weapon of choice, a sword (and grenades, if we can have combos), I'd say I could probably get several hundred before I did something stupid and stabbed myself.
johnjimjones
27-11-2005 12:50:31
Hmm I'm going to need that weapon of choice with that kinda of energy.
kdollar
27-11-2005 13:07:59
by myself 20, weapon of choice- lightsaber ...............until i get tired i guess.
cyberpunk243
27-11-2005 14:02:13
1,000,000,000,000,000,005 approx.
drummer_kew_03
27-11-2005 14:07:31
I could probably take out several thousand if I had a gravity gun. I've been playing too much half life lately.
KeithA
27-11-2005 14:13:07
[quoteb93354b66e="drummer_kew_03"]I could probably take out several thousand if I had a gravity gun. I've been playing too much half life lately.[/quoteb93354b66e]
That's an oxymoron.
drummer_kew_03
27-11-2005 14:14:40
true. How about this I've been playing a lot of HL2 lately.