Who will you be voting for on November 7th?

I'm curious to see who FiPG users will be casting their votes for on November 7th for their states.

Both Senate races and Gubernatorial (if applicable in your states)...

I'll start off with mine

[b8e3b70f4f1]Governor - Tony Knowles - Democrat[/b8e3b70f4f1]

http//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e4/Tony.jpg[" alt=""/img8e3b70f4f1]

He was the 9th Governor of Alaska from 1994 - 2002 until he had to let a new Governor take office (Alaska law states that you can only be Governor for two consecutive terms, but you can run again after someone else has been Governor for one term)... Well that Governor from 2002-2006, Frank Murkowski has lost any hope for re-election... Frank Murkowski only received [b8e3b70f4f1]19%[/b8e3b70f4f1] of the Alaska vote when he ran of re-election, so he is out of there... Now the two candidates that are running are former Governor Tony Knowles and this skanky slut

[img="8e3b70f4f1]http//www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/hbo/media/sarahpalin.jpg[" alt=""/img8e3b70f4f1]

Sarah Palin. This whore has absolutely no experience in politics except for being the Mayor of Wasilla where even her own city's citizens disapprove of her job performance... and there's the Alaska Gas Pipeline deal that Alaska desperately needs, and she has absolutely no experience in handling it and she doesn't have a platform for handling it. Tony Knowles on the other hand has eight years experience with the Oil Industry and will get a Pipeline contract without sacrifice.

This year's Alaska PFD Checks were $1,100 per citizen. That means every citizen received a check from the state for the amount of $1,100. The PFD (Permanent Fund Dividend) is the People's Money. Every citizen gets an equal share of the PFD every year. How much everyone gets depends on how well the State does for that year. Which is why the Gas Pipeline is so important, if you have someone inexperienced in office who doesn't know jackshit about dealing with the Oil Companies, you can kiss your money goodbye. The PFD is on the track to rising... That means every year, every Alaskan will get more money if the State does better. This isn't the time to fuck it up by putting a failed mayor of a city in power. It would be a grave mistake. That's why I am voting for Tony Knowles...

There is no Senate race for Alaska in 2006. Just the Governor.

I'm surprised there is no mention of a marijuana-supporting runner in this post.

Wow. If you read any of his previous posts, Alaska is very lenient on marijuana possession and cultivation.

But I wasn't surprised to see you thread crapping.

[quote25faf9a6ac="UberVash"]I'm surprised there is no mention of a marijuana-supporting runner in this post.[/quote25faf9a6ac]

[quote25faf9a6ac][Democratic nominee] Tony Knowles said he supports the constitutional right to privacy that protects a small amount of marijuana in private homes, and said the state has better ways to spend its public safety money.

"We have an urgent need to use public safety resources for the meth labs that we know are out of control, the gang violence in urban areas and for rural villages that have no public safety service at all," he said.[/quote25faf9a6ac]

[quote25faf9a6ac]Former Governor Knowles -- seeking to reclaim the governor's chair after four years on the sidelines -- supports Alaska's current state law allowing the possession of small amounts of marijuana in the privacy of one's home.

As opposed to the last four years under Frank Murkowski, it appears the people of Alaska will have a governor in 2007 with distinctly more rational views on marijuana policy.[/quote25faf9a6ac]

In other words, He supports the Alaska Supreme Court ruling of Ravin v. Alaska and the Alaska Constitution that gives you the right to have a reasonable amount of marijuana for personal issue.

[quotefcc67a3288="TryinToGetPaid"]Wow. If you read any of his previous posts, Alaska is very lenient on marijuana possession and cultivation.

But I wasn't surprised to see you thread crapping.[/quotefcc67a3288]

Wasn't surprised? o_O;;

Anyways, it was a joke. Almost all of his posts involve marijuana supporting/pride for his state of Alaska. After reading his marijuana topic, I learned about Alaska's marijuana laws. But I was awaiting him to also make a statement on how one candidate supports loosening marijuana laws while the other one is against legalized marijuana.

I'm not registered to vote, so I will not be voting on the 7th.

Although I still can't vote, I would for these guys. I hope my parents vote for them as well.

http//www.modernvertebrate.com/elections/2004-president/images/lieberman.gif[" alt=""/imgd146611682]

Joe Lieberman for US Senate


[img="d146611682]http//www.cityofnewhaven.com/Mayor/images/Mayor2005.jpg[" alt=""/imgd146611682]

John DeStefano for CT governor

Basically, I had it up to here with all these Republican scandals and there leadership. I am sick of them catering to business owners and wealthy Americans.

[quotee61b59f161="UberVash"][quotee61b59f161="TryinToGetPaid"]Wow. If you read any of his previous posts, Alaska is very lenient on marijuana possession and cultivation.

But I wasn't surprised to see you thread crapping.[/quotee61b59f161]

Wasn't surprised? o_O;;

Anyways, it was a joke. Almost all of his posts involve marijuana supporting/pride for his state of Alaska. After reading his marijuana topic, I learned about Alaska's marijuana laws. But I was awaiting him to also make a statement on how one candidate supports loosening marijuana laws while the other one is against legalized marijuana.

I'm not registered to vote, so I will not be voting on the 7th.[/quotee61b59f161]

You're not even allowed to vote. You're only 17.

[quotee61b59f161="Powerbook"]Although I still can't vote, I would for these guys. I hope my parents vote for them as well.[/quotee61b59f161]

If I was a Connecticut citizen, I would vote for Lieberman as well. Don't know anything about the gubernatorial candidate.

I'm allowed to vote, but haven't really decided.

[quoteb2377aa125="tylerc"]I'm allowed to vote, but haven't really decided.[/quoteb2377aa125]

Who are the candidates?

[quote4e1f16b138="h3x"][quote4e1f16b138="tylerc"]I'm allowed to vote, but haven't really decided.[/quote4e1f16b138]

Who are the candidates?[/quote4e1f16b138]

Yeah screw Ned Lamont. Fricken millionaire who lays off people and pretends to be close to minorities. My ass Ned Lamont. I don't care if Lieberman is not a Democrat anymore, or if he is semi-republican. Ned Lamont is just a prick.

The Indiana Senate elections are interesting... Because there is no Democrat candidate running against the 5-time Senator, Richard Lugar

http/" alt=""/img63.imageshack.us/img="63/9391/503pxdicklugarspeakingaup5.jpg[" alt=""/img5d806ae777]

The only opposition he has is Libertarian candidate, Steve Osborn

[img="5d806ae777]http//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Steve_Osborn.jpg/200px-Steve_Osborn.jpg[" alt=""/img5d806ae777]

I'm placing my chips on the incumbent.

http/" alt=""/img64.imageshack.us/img="64/9238/untitledrn5.png[" alt=""/img07db5c8948]


Who else but Kinky Friedman for Texas Governor?

LMAO, I will be shitting bricks if Kinky is governor.

To those of you who might be new to voting, let me offer a piece of advice

Don't vote the party line.

There are good Republicans, good Democrats, good Libertarians, and good Independents. Educate yourself about your candidates and vote on the overall issues.

I myself have a more conservative bent, however I am a moderate conservative -- think John McCain and Colin Powell. I voted for Bush (both times) and do support going to war in Iraq, however I do not necessarily agree with how the war has been handled and all the decisions of this administration. But that's okay -- I participated in Gulf War I, and while I supported that operation then too, not all of us necessarily agreed with how that war was handled in some ways either. I've probably lived through, and no doubt voted in, more Presidential elections than most of you here, and I don't remember a single administration that did everything "right."

So despite the current administrations failings, that doesn't mean I swear off all Republicans forever. And it doesn't mean I won't vote for moderate Democrats.

Close-minded, fundamentalist, idealistic zealotry is what we should avoid. No separatist neo-cons, no flaming PETA members, that sort of thing. ;)

He thinks he is winning. He is really big here you would be surprised. I live in a huge republican stronghold where I see Tom Delay flyers all the time and we just border his district, and I can not drive anywhere without seeing one or two cars with a Kinky bumper sticker.

Why can my image tags not work?

LOL RAWK THE VOTE THATS WAHT SNOOP SIAD!!

I'll be voting for Democrat Jim Webb for the Virginia Senate elections.

Jennifer Granholm/Dick Devos
http//wwmt.com/pictures/1160478129-grandevos.jpg[" alt=""/img7d8b713160]

Granholm ftw


also up for grabs in MI is a senate seat between Debbie Stabenow and Mike Bouchard. I'm not sure about Stabenow after she recently voted in favor of the military commissions act but I can't imagine i'd like Bouchard more, so debbie will get my vote i think.

[quote57a0d88fea="dmorris68"]To those of you who might be new to voting, let me offer a piece of advice

Don't vote the party line.

There are good Republicans, good Democrats, good Libertarians, and good Independents. Educate yourself about your candidates and vote on the overall issues.

I myself have a more conservative bent, however I am a moderate conservative -- think John McCain and Colin Powell. I voted for Bush (both times) and do support going to war in Iraq, however I do not necessarily agree with how the war has been handled and all the decisions of this administration. But that's okay -- I participated in Gulf War I, and while I supported that operation then too, not all of us necessarily agreed with how that war was handled in some ways either. I've probably lived through, and no doubt voted in, more Presidential elections than most of you here, and I don't remember a single administration that did everything "right."

So despite the current administrations failings, that doesn't mean I swear off all Republicans forever. And it doesn't mean I won't vote for moderate Democrats.

Close-minded, fundamentalist, idealistic zealotry is what we should avoid. No separatist neo-cons, no flaming PETA members, that sort of thing. ;)[/quote57a0d88fea]

Agreed... I'm a conservative on most issues and I'm voting for a Democrat (there's a few issues I flat out disagree with him on, but there's a few that I do agree with him on... Whereas with Sarah Palin, I just can't find any common ground with her at all... and I think she's the biggest phony. You should see her demeanor to know what I'm talking about).

Just because you're leaning towards one way of the political spectrum, doesn't mean you have to vote for a Republican or a Democrat. Vote for whoever you think will represent you the best.

Speaking of McCain, I truly hope he runs for President... He has my vote. I think he'd make a great president.

[quote73a363d928="Allen626"]Why can my image tags not work?[/quote73a363d928]

Because it isn't linking to an image file...

http/" alt=""/img64.imageshack.us/img="64/9238/untitledrn5.png[" alt=""/img73a363d928]

Fixed.

This is going to be an interesting thread.


And I agree with h3x, McCain has my vote the instant he decides to run for president.

yes on 3 yes on 2 and claire mccaskill

[quote41536d5237="beanman25"]yes on 3 yes on 2 and claire mccaskill[/quote41536d5237]

It would help to know what the initiatives are... and I agree with you on McCaskill...

I'm voting No on 2 (Gas Reserves Tax).. A bill co-authored by a former Democrat candidate, Eric Kroft... It would tax the oil companies billions of dollars a year for every year that a gas pipeline is not built... It's a foolish move that would only kill any hope for a gas pipeline... Both Knowles and Palin are against the initiative and I'd say at least 70-75% of Alaskans are against it... There has not been 1 advertisement that supports the bill, only advertisement to shoot it down... It will be rejected for sure.

[quote4ddf41a44b="h3x"][quote4ddf41a44b="Allen626"]Why can my image tags not work?[/quote4ddf41a44b]

Because it isn't linking to an image file...

Fixed.[/quote4ddf41a44b]

Thanks. I can't believe I did not see that.

Michael Steele For Maryland Senator[=http//www.steeleformaryland.com/]Michael Steele For Maryland Senator

I'm good enough to pay taxes and eat their Cheese-Nips, but not good enough to vote. shrug

I have a deep-rooted hatred for all gay, black, Hispanic, and poor people, so I'd vote Republican if I could.

LMAO.

[quote53e75f4591="theysayjump"]I'm good enough to pay taxes and eat their Cheese-Nips, but not good enough to vote. shrug

[b53e75f4591]I have a deep-rooted hatred for all gay, black, Hispanic, and poor people, so I'd vote Republican if I could.[/b53e75f4591][/quote53e75f4591]

<3

+Karma.

shrug I do vote Republican for the most part

So does my [b3d3c64a40d]Hispanic[/b3d3c64a40d] wife... shrug

[quote82b76a7cfa="Powerbook"]Although I still can't vote, I would for these guys. I hope my parents vote for them as well.

http//www.modernvertebrate.com/elections/2004-president/images/lieberman.gif[" alt=""/img82b76a7cfa]

Joe Lieberman for US Senate


[img="82b76a7cfa]http//www.cityofnewhaven.com/Mayor/images/Mayor2005.jpg[" alt=""/img82b76a7cfa]

John DeStefano for CT governor

Basically, I had it up to here with all these Republican scandals and there leadership. I am sick of them catering to business owners and wealthy Americans.[/quote82b76a7cfa]

What??? Lieberman is as Republican as you can go while still being under the Democratic party. He's continually supported just about everything Bush has proposed. It's unfortunate that he's been in there too long so he has a lot of financial backing and support from other congressmen (including NYC Mayor Bloomberg) so I'd go with Phil Lamont. Personally I've liked the job Jodi Rell has done especially after having to replace "he-who-should-not-be-named" ;) but I haven't heard much about DeStefano so I can't really say much about him.

http//media.schwarzenegger.ca/arnold/Schwarzenegger.jpg[" alt=""/imga85ecf8b9c]

I was being facetiously stereotypical. shrug

Here in Utah its like throwing my vote away but Ill be going for the Dem in every election.

[quote99f7b8cfe1="Allen626"]http/" alt=""/img64.imageshack.us/img="64/9238/untitledrn5.png[" alt=""/img99f7b8cfe1]


Who else but Kinky Friedman for Texas Governor?[/quote99f7b8cfe1]
yup

I have the choice of Ehrlich/Cox or O'Malley/Brown (sigh) this is for Governor.

Cox is a blind white woman...mine as well have a midget run.

[quote2e96acb592]Cox is a blind white woman...mine as well have a midget run.[/quote2e96acb592]

Wow. That was nice.

Something interesting I found on Electoral-Vote.com

Projected New Houseli (as of 11/01/06)

[bd4e9574eef]239 Democrats[/bd4e9574eef]
195 Republicans
1 Tie

There's a map there with detailed info of all the projected results for each state based on Rasmussen Reports, SurveyUSA, Zogby and other opinion polls.

But there are a few states that are tossups and a quite a few that are leaning left or right but is well within margin of error and also the fact that this is only based on opinion polls, so take it with a grain of salt.

I voted....

http//media.schwarzenegger.ca/arnold/Schwarzenegger.jpg[" alt=""/imgcd5c035666]

Everyone around my area are Arnold Haters. If i wouldve registered, it wouldve been
http//www.seiu715.org/images/phil_angelides_020706_150105.jpg[" alt=""/img59c6d62aed]

Angelidas is dead, down by like 20 percent. Republicans taking back over California, like how it used to be.

2 is allowing use of stem cells, my mom had als so thats why. and yes on 3 raises tobacco taxes

[quote659f143def="stackmjwiz"]Michael Steele For Maryland Senator[=http//www.steeleformaryland.com/]Michael Steele For Maryland Senator[/quote659f143def]

fuck that, Ben Cardin for Maryland Senator.

Cardin (49%) has a 5 point lead over Steele (44%) as of today.

Lieberman (48%) has a 9 point lead over Lamont (39%) and a 40 point lead over Schlesinger (8%).

McCaskill and Talent are tied at 47%.

Webb and Allen are tied at 47%.

Stabenow (52%) has a 12 point lead over Bouchard (40%).

... and in my home state of Washington, Cantwell has a 9 point lead over McGavick.

[quotea6cee67066]Cardin has a 5 point lead over Steele as of today.[/quotea6cee67066]

How could Michael Steele be running step by step with a Democrat in a historically solid blue state (2 registered Democrats to 1 Republican)?

With less than a week to go? In a extremely hostile year for Republicans?


1. Steele is winning the battle of ideas (huge proponent of education change, small business, views on the role of government)
2. Steele is a independent, charismatic guy who has won over significant members of the opposition party
3. Steele has not let attacks from the Cardin camp go unanswered[=http//www.steeleformaryland.com/videos.htm]unanswered.
4. Cardin's strategy for winning the election is just sitting back and hoping the huge Democratic registration advantage, the anti-Bush environment, and favorable [ia6cee67066]Washington Post[/ia6cee67066] press will carry him through
5. A large number of MD Democrats feel left out[=http//washingtontimes.com/metro/20061102-115435-3191r.htm]left out, being taken advantage of, and ignored by the leadership

Steele has cut Cardin's lead in half in a matter of several months. If Steele had a (D) next to his name, the MSM would be fondling him like the next big rock star (see Obama, Barack). Instead, he has endured the dirtiest attacks of the campaign season (see stolen credit report, slander from Esquire magazine, "sambo", "slavish" rhetoric)

As a conservative in Maryland, I'm so excited we have an opportunity to put a candidate like Mike Steele in the Senate. It's great to have someone you genuinely root for because of who is he and who he stands for, not just because he happens to be affiliated with a certain party.

Hey guys! Don't forget to vote today if you can. You got till like 8pm i think. I changed my mind about Joe Lieberman btw. I decided he had 18 years to do some good things, but he did very little. It is time for a change. That is why I told my parents to vote for Lamont. )

Lamont is the coolest last name ever.

[quotee44c80db09="unlabeledbooze"]http//media.schwarzenegger.ca/arnold/Schwarzenegger.jpg[" alt=""/imge44c80db09][/quotee44c80db09]
No fucking way!

[quote60db9618e9="Wolfeman"][quote60db9618e9="unlabeledbooze"]http//media.schwarzenegger.ca/arnold/Schwarzenegger.jpg[" alt=""/img60db9618e9][/quote60db9618e9]
No fucking way![/quote60db9618e9]


Whoever voted for him in the past and will now is a complete retard.

I felt like shit today so I slept and didn't vote.

If I was home, I would have. I didn't realize that absentee ballots were supposed to be sent in like 30 days [iab257d1a25]before[/iab257d1a25] the election. oops

Looks as if the BBC are projecting a Republican win in both the Senate and the House.

http//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/americas/2006/mid_terms/default.stm

[quote7ee0996ccd="theysayjump"]Looks as if the BBC are projecting a Republican win in both the Senate and the House.

http//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/americas/2006/mid_terms/default.stm[/quote7ee0996ccd]

I was checking out CNN.com, you can see that Republicans have already lost a few seats in the senate and a few more in the House, so in the end, the Republicans won't hold as big of a majority as they did before.

[quote3037599739="tylerc"]I felt like shit today so I slept and didn't vote.[/quote3037599739]

[quote3037599739="johnjimjones"]If I was home, I would have. I didn't realize that absentee ballots were supposed to be sent in like 30 days before the election. oops[/quote3037599739]

http//forum.freeipodguide.com/smilies_mod/upload/0de66723c22f03beb44f2f1ac59f1b8f.gif[" alt=""/img3037599739]

[img="3037599739]http/" alt=""/img149.imageshack.us/img="149/3685/1107061452vv5.jpg[" alt=""/img3037599739]

Did you just call C-Span, h3x?

Looks like the Dem's have the House; 218 to 178.

According to the BBC anyway.

[quote085f1161d9="theysayjump"]Looks like the Dem's have the House; 218 to 178.

According to the BBC anyway.[/quote085f1161d9]

and are currently in the lead for the Senate, booya!

[quotec6d7d077f3="johnjimjones"][quotec6d7d077f3="theysayjump"]Looks like the Dem's have the House; 218 to 178.

According to the BBC anyway.[/quotec6d7d077f3]

and are currently in the lead for the Senate, booya![/quotec6d7d077f3]

The BBC had them at 47 - 46 for the Red's.

(CNN) -- Democrats are projected to pick up three of the six GOP-held Senate seats in their bid to regain control of the Senate.

It becomes painfully obvious that democracy has failed when any party can gain "control" of any branch of the government. (

[quote1617241416="ilanbg"]It becomes painfully obvious that democracy has failed when any party can gain "control" of any branch of the government. ([/quote1617241416]

Why is that? It could be just as possible that people didn't like the way things were being run?

[quote9dbb3304d7="johnjimjones"][quote9dbb3304d7="ilanbg"]It becomes painfully obvious that democracy has failed when any party can gain "control" of any branch of the government. ([/quote9dbb3304d7]

Why is that? It could be just as possible that people didn't like the way things were being run?[/quote9dbb3304d7]

I think he simply meant that he doesn't think that any party should be able to have "control" over a single branch of the government, not that it's bad to have the Dem's in charge or that it's bad to have the Red's in charge.

I don't think people should vote on parties and nominees, but instead people should vote on policies.

[quote0c3ecc9f8d="theysayjump"][quote0c3ecc9f8d="johnjimjones"][quote0c3ecc9f8d="ilanbg"]It becomes painfully obvious that democracy has failed when any party can gain "control" of any branch of the government. ([/quote0c3ecc9f8d]

Why is that? It could be just as possible that people didn't like the way things were being run?[/quote0c3ecc9f8d]

I think he simply meant that he doesn't think that any party should be able to have "control" over a single branch of the government, not that it's bad to have the Dem's in charge or that it's bad to have the Red's in charge.

I don't think people should vote on parties and nominees, but instead people should vote on policies.[/quote0c3ecc9f8d]

Oh ok, that makes more sense. I think based on policies is a good idea in theory, but it's so easy for them to change policies.

[quote724c46fce4="theysayjump"]Did you just call C-Span, h3x?[/quote724c46fce4]

Ehh.... No....... why?

[quote941dd1b175="h3x"][quote941dd1b175="theysayjump"]Did you just call C-Span, h3x?[/quote941dd1b175]

Ehh.... No....... why?[/quote941dd1b175]

Meh, there was a stoner Republican from Alaska calling. shrug

off to bed. dems need 2 of 3 senate seats left.
unless the projections are wrong (that has never happened before ;))

Lol. The race for district 1 U.S. House rep. is 50/50
http//www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14188253/

i woulda voted for lynn swann

So who's psyched to go voting tomorrow????

[quote848f51309a="ilanbg"]So who's psyched to go voting tomorrow????[/quote848f51309a]

ding! arrow ilanbg

YEAHHHHH THE GOVERNATOR WON

i am excited!! dems may take the senate too! my prediction it comes down to montana

In the senate race, I think dems will win montana and missouri (barely). Dem will win Virginia but there will be a recount either way.

Maybe i am still laughing from my "boy or girl" post, but i think they all look funny


http//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e4/Tony.jpg[" alt=""/imgca9b4a217d] [img="ca9b4a217d]http//www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/hbo/media/sarahpalin.jpg[" alt=""/imgca9b4a217d] [img="ca9b4a217d]http//www.modernvertebrate.com/elections/2004-president/images/lieberman.gif[" alt=""/imgca9b4a217d] [img="ca9b4a217d]http//www.cityofnewhaven.com/Mayor/images/Mayor2005.jpg[" alt=""/imgca9b4a217d] [img="ca9b4a217d]http/" alt=""/img63.imageshack.us/img="63/9391/503pxdicklugarspeakingaup5.jpg[" alt=""/imgca9b4a217d] [img="ca9b4a217d]http//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Steve_Osborn.jpg/200px-Steve_Osborn.jpg[" alt=""/imgca9b4a217d] [img="ca9b4a217d]http//wwmt.com/pictures/1160478129-grandevos.jpg[" alt=""/imgca9b4a217d]


well, maybe Dick and Jennifer arent okay. But the rest look constipated!!!



Seriously though, i am glad so many voted here (including me). Also good that even though some people arent old enough to vote, they still keep up with what is going on.

In ohio we FINALLY got those electronic vote casters (as opposed to our old "pin push" ones).

Congratulations Alaska... You have officially won the "Fucknuts of the Year" award.

With 65% reporting... 50% have voted for that slut, Sarah Palin... Tony Knowles has 38% of the vote.

Better kiss the PFD goodbye because she's going to fuck it all up.

Dude, it's close as shit and between Montana and Virginia in the Senate. Both have 49 each those two states are the last to go.

Dem's are winning in both of them. Virginia looks to be done (99% reporting with the Dem's 7,000 votes in front) but Montana is only at 74% reporting and the Dem's are 6,000 in front.

yeah, thar tee v sed der gunna doa recow't proly.

http//forum.freeipodguide.com/smilies_mod/upload/e096f892756d0954a193bcda6fbf6f83.gif[" alt=""/img9cf010f2f7][img="9cf010f2f7]http//forum.freeipodguide.com/smilies_mod/upload/e096f892756d0954a193bcda6fbf6f83.gif[" alt=""/img9cf010f2f7][img="9cf010f2f7]http//forum.freeipodguide.com/smilies_mod/upload/e096f892756d0954a193bcda6fbf6f83.gif[" alt=""/img9cf010f2f7]

still too close to call. there will definitely be a recount in virginia per state law no matter the result

I just hope it won't be anything like what happened with the Gubernatorial race in Washington in 2004. Dino Rossi (R) clearly won but that fucking witch Christine Gregoire got a recount... It still didn't tip in her favor so she got another recount... Still didn't tip in her favor, got the money needed for a third and final recount and she won by just a few votes... Bitch.

[quote86114d041c="tylerc"]I felt like shit today so I slept and didn't vote.[/quote86114d041c]
I did too and I toughed it out girly man...

http//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6131122.stm

I had an interesting experience on Tuesday. After I exited the little booth I was waiting for my husband off to the side of the room. A very old man was sitting there with a list of names and asked what my name was. I told him and he goes shuffling through the papers. Eventually he figures out that I'm not on there and says "Oh you're not on here" I'm curious so I ask what the list is. He says "It's a list of registered republicans in the area. But you're probably just registered independent" with kind of an amused air. So I stare at him and ask "So, I'm curious how you came to that conclusion?" Now he's all flustered and is just like "Um..well...ah..." "Because I'm actually a registered democrat. Did you assume that a woman in her twenties wouldn't be registered? Or just not as a democrat?" He has no answer for this so we leave haha.